Doctor Barrett in his analysis, points out that while the notion of integrative health and wellness is a popular term today, that it’s meaning is very unclear, and has been used to cover many phony health care practices. I post it here more as FYI only. As long as this steers towards science based application rather than marketing of non scientifically based claims, I’m in favor of it.
Representatives Jared Polis (D-CO) and Mike Coffman (R-CO) have launched the Integrative Health and Wellness Congressional Caucus in the U.S. House of Representatives. The caucus’s stated purpose is to “serve as a non-partisan educational forum for legislators to receive up-to-date information from experts related to best practices and new research, and to discuss legislative and administrative opportunities for integrative health.” The press release announcing their move states:
Integrative health emphasizes prevention, health creation, health promotion and general well-being, and includes therapies like acupuncture, chiropractic, and mindfulness. At a time when the most expensive drains on our nation’s health dollars are chronic conditions like diabetes, heart disease, and high blood pressure, integrative approaches can offer improved outcomes with lower costs. While at least a third of Americans use complementary or alternative medicines, access is often inconsistent. This caucus will provide a platform for legislators to participate together and focus on the important opportunity that integrative health and wellness approaches offers across federally funded health programs, and find ways to make these solutions more available to the American people. [Polis, Coffman launch bipartisan Integrative Health and Wellness Caucus, citing successes of integrative health treatments. Office of Jared Polis. Press release, Oct 25, 2017]
“Integrative medicine” does not have a definable scope. It is a marketing slogan used by practitioners who claim to combine “alternative” and mainstream approaches to medicine to provide the best of both approaches. This may sound reasonable, but (a) the term is actually a smokescreen behind which enthusiasts routinely use dubious practices and (b) some of the preventive measures they embrace are part of standard care and others simply don’t work. [Barrett S. Be wary of “alternative,” “complementary,” and “integrative” health methods. Quackwatch, Oct 30, 2017] It remains to be seen whether caucus members will promote approaches that will improve health care in the U.S. or merely add to its cost.